在日通名制度と既存事実名と現実

在日通名制度と既存事実名と現実

最下部一凛の華

A single flower at the very bottom

ヤクザ暴力団についてはかなり詳しくありません。本当に良く解らないけども

嫌がらせが目的で日本人が逮捕者の氏名を通名を使用した外国出身者であるという説を2000年代に騒がれていたが、世界各地の現在の有力層の関与も一部伺える形で考えられる。特にマフィア関連の有力層は不満や怒りなどの苛立ちからの犯行の動機の可能性は人によってはあるだろうが、其処にアメリカ人もフランス人もイギリス人も関係ないのだから、そういうモノはあると思う。

The System of *Tsūmei* (Alias ​​Names) for Foreign Residents in Japan: Established Facts and Reality

In the 2000s, there was an uproar over the theory that Japanese people were using the *tsūmei* (aliases) of foreign-born individuals who had been arrested—specifically to engage in harassment. However, one can also consider the potential involvement of influential figures from various parts of the world. While some might argue that influential figures linked to the mafia could be motivated by frustration—such as resentment or anger—to commit such acts, the fact remains that Americans, French, and British nationals are not involved in this specific context; thus, such phenomena likely exist independently of them.

ただ見聞きしてきた暴力団の家庭の人々は通称名の帰化名は不明ながら実名で活動しているらしきインターネット情報を閲覧して、確かに隠しては居ないだろうとは思うが、嫌がらせや偽名はあるでしょう。その八つ当たりの不満性や正反対の性質への怒りや憎しみなどの感情は暴力団排除条例以降、ますます活発になった可能性はある。合わないとうのは結局どんなになってもそう。氏の正反対の意味の合わないと一部方向性は一致するが、YAKUZAなどから現在進行形で成り上がった人々にも本物と其の者の家を敵として攻撃するための使い捨ての予定で引きこむ傾向もあったでしょうし、そういう本当の確信犯系は被害者系の声が耳障りだし、明治時代前後から海外の時代構成の影響や計らいがあってか有力者になった暴力団層の原型にはプライドやほこりがあったのかもしれないが、ただ、根深い色々な時代背景の怒りの説はそれすら嘘である可能性を含み現代へ受け継いだ形になっている、其れが真実であるかも誰も知らずに…

それでも本名として出生名で活動しているだろう聞いたことがある（誰でも位）人々がインターネットで見かけた、其れが普通なんだろう。

どうでもいいんですけども…

…

それでも特に朝鮮人の通名制度は騒がれているが其れが国内朝鮮ヤクザの八つ当たりや工作員説（確かに通名制度や自称制度では著しく朝鮮の犯行を感じる支持された人々も）もありそうですが、何故人々は被害者の回復よりそういう陰湿な不正な性質を好んだのかについては犯罪被害者が落ち目になり、競争相手が少なくなって安心したという競争原理が時々被害を加速させる。

日本は敗戦国以前にUSA又はUKに占領された明治時代までの懸念すら伺えるほど明治時代以降は神社などの偽りの乱立など不信であるのですが、もしそれが事実明治時代前後からも始まっているとしたら日本島は其の頃から大きく失っていった真実があるでしょう。

実際に悪意によって通名制度を認めている又は通しやすい半ば肯定する傾向もあるでしょう、行き過ぎた不正競争の末に（其れが世の構造の幾つかの時代の終わりを想定したとしても）多くの懸念を感じざるを得ないのですが、暴力団や海外朝鮮関連者や其れと結託した派競争意識が意図する人へは帰化人の名士の字を引用して敵意を抱きながらイメージを陥れる、そうして犯罪を継続していくそれが日本の幾つかの派閥にあった場合、そんな人々居ないというほどの欠損が伺えるのですが、そういう事があるかもしれない。

多くは間違った人生は例え公的であり綺麗に見えてもあるとは思うのですが（一見綺麗に見えるし所得は多ければまだいい・損するのは駄目になっていって間違いの系ですよね？其れが正常さについては迷惑で間違いであれど）

間違った人々の実在は異様に見えるが本来は色々あったかもしれないし、離婚家又は既存実名である場合が少なくないと思うんです。確かに通名制度や帰化名の悪意的な届け出はあると思うのですが意味がない人物を作る方が異常ではある。

意味のない人になってしまう。

そういう現実が今の日本にあり、札付き感の日本の現実は

其の結果予定通り究極の悪の国として近未来強化された原子爆弾を投下して消してしまう為の口実であり最高の方針である可能性はあるのだから自重や対策を講じるべきだとは思う。

兎に角帰化名は基本的に認める必要はない、既存名や歴史的に実在した氏を名乗る必要が無いという事実を感じますね。たださっきも書いた通り、色々あって離婚家や通名や偽名などの名前で報道を狙うという犯罪性はもう日本の何処にも大きな信用はないかもしれないのだからあり得ると思います。

Regarding the families of organized crime members—whose real names are used in public activities even if their naturalized names (or aliases) remain unknown—I assume they aren't actively hiding their identities, though harassment and the use of aliases likely still occur. It is possible that emotions such as displaced frustration, or anger and hatred toward those with diametrically opposed natures, have intensified since the enactment of organized crime exclusion ordinances. Fundamental incompatibility remains a constant, regardless of circumstances. While there is some alignment with the idea of ​​"incompatibility" in the sense of being polar opposites, there was also a tendency for established YAKUZA figures to recruit individuals—treating them as disposable pawns to attack "authentic" targets and their families. These calculated, hardcore operatives likely found the voices of victims grating. Furthermore, while the prototypes of organized crime figures who rose to power around the Meiji era—influenced by shifting global dynamics—may have possessed a sense of pride or honor, the narrative attributing their anger to deep-seated historical grievances might itself be a fabrication passed down to the present day—a truth no one truly knows.

Nevertheless, the people I’ve heard of (and whom almost everyone knows) who operate under their birth names—as seen on the internet—likely represent the norm.

It hardly matters, though...

...

There is significant controversy surrounding the system of aliases used by Koreans in Japan; this system is often linked to displaced aggression by Korean-affiliated YAKUZA or theories about covert operatives (and indeed, there are figures supported by the public whose crimes—often involving aliases or self-proclaimed identities—strongly suggest a Korean background). As for why people gravitated toward such insidious, dishonest traits rather than prioritizing the recovery of victims: the principle of competition plays a role—people feel relieved when crime victims fall on hard times and competition decreases, a mindset that can sometimes accelerate the victimization process.

Japan’s post-Meiji era is rife with distrust—evidenced by the proliferation of dubious shrines and the like—raising concerns that date back even further, perhaps to the pre-defeat era of occupation by the US or UK. If this pattern of deception indeed began around the Meiji era, then the Japanese islands may have lost sight of a profound truth as far back as that time. There is likely a tendency to tacitly accept or facilitate the "alias system" (using a name other than one's legal name) out of malice. While one might speculate that this stems from an era-defining structural shift, the resulting excessive unfair competition—and the potential for organized crime groups, individuals linked to overseas Korean interests, and colluding factions to weaponize the names of prominent naturalized citizens to tarnish reputations while committing crimes—raises serious concerns. It suggests a disturbing void in accountability, yet such scenarios may well be occurring.

Many people lead lives that are fundamentally "wrong," even if they appear respectable or successful on the surface—prioritizing high income while letting other aspects of life crumble into a pattern of error. While such a lifestyle is misguided and troublesome, the existence of these individuals—who may have complex backgrounds, such as multiple divorces or the use of various aliases—is a peculiar reality. While malicious use of the alias system or naturalized names certainly exists, the very act of creating a persona devoid of genuine substance is what is truly abnormal.

They end up becoming people without real substance.

This is the reality in Japan today—a reality where certain individuals carry a notorious stigma.

There is a possibility that this situation serves as the ultimate pretext and strategy for Japan to be branded a "nation of ultimate evil" in the near future, justifying its obliteration by advanced nuclear weapons; therefore, restraint and countermeasures are surely warranted.

Ultimately, there is no fundamental need to permit the use of naturalized names—or to adopt existing names or surnames with historical significance. However, as previously mentioned, given the complex backgrounds involved—including divorce and the criminal intent to manipulate media coverage through aliases or false names—it is entirely plausible that such practices occur, even if public trust in these systems has largely eroded.

生まれた時から家庭の宗教上の設定で一凛の花というフレーズを見掛けた事を思い出した。

不信仰なもので実質上の生まれた環境設定が浄土系か日蓮系が最初の設定か不明だったが

幼少拝まされた事があるか不明ながら大人になって宗教にきずいて辞めてから

随分経過しますが

泥の中に咲いた一凛の華、其れを見て詳しくは不明だが多分落とし穴があるか、どこかの無関係の王様の事かなと思ってたのですが、もしかしたら宗教家庭の人は其の本人が一輪の花という境遇だった可能性があるんだろうか？ただ罠である可能性はあると思うが…もしかして男性だけど自分もかもしれないという可能性に罠がないか、思い出して不安になった時の記憶が今では懐かしい、

その環境を美味しいと思ってもいけないし、罠について考えたくなると思う

優れた者達は数多いのですが、自分がもし一凛の華というべき事実があれば

ちょっと失礼にも思いますが人ではなく環境と思えば…其れに人々は或いは魂の旅の途中、其処を離れるべきかも

そうしなければ難しいだろうとも思う

一人だけ本当は存在が（僕の場合）違うという事への無知が真実か罠があるのか、其れでも状況によっては良く見えた者達がどうなのか時々不安だったり思案したりしています。

もしかしたら旧来の消えかけた華人説の中の一人の欧州枠仮説が本来なのか答えを見るにはうまくいく事だろうと思うのですが

I recall encountering the phrase "a single flower" within the religious context of my family upbringing.

As I am not a believer, I was never certain whether my original environment was rooted in the Pure Land or Nichiren traditions—

—and while I do not know if I was ever made to pray as a child, a long time has passed since I became aware of the religion and stepped away from it.

I used to see that image of "a single flower blooming in the mud" and wonder about it; I didn't know the details, but I imagined it might refer to a pitfall or perhaps some unrelated king. Yet, I wonder now: could it be that, for someone raised in a religious household, the person themselves was meant to embody that "single flower" existence? Of course, there is the possibility that it was merely a trap... I remember feeling anxious—wondering if *I* might be that flower, despite being male, and whether that thought itself was a trap. Looking back, that memory feels nostalgic now.

One feels one shouldn't find that environment appealing, yet one also feels compelled to ponder the nature of the trap.

There are many exceptional people out there, but if I were to consider the possibility that I am, in fact, that "single flower"...

It might seem a bit rude to say, but if I view it not as a matter of *personhood* but of *environment*—well, perhaps people—or rather, souls on a journey—ought to leave such a place.

I suspect that without doing so, things would be difficult.

There is the ignorance regarding the fact that my existence is fundamentally different (in my case); I wonder if that ignorance is the truth or a trap. Even so, I sometimes feel anxious or contemplative about the people who once appeared so admirable to me, wondering what their reality truly is.

Perhaps the answer lies in the "European slot" hypothesis—one part of the old, fading "Chinese diaspora" theory. I imagine that seeing how things play out will eventually reveal the truth.