Europe The world's best executives currently have only one decision！
The world will go to war and it will go to Japan as well. Receiving the world's message read the world's will.
The text is intense, this article is not really a declaration of war on Europe, nor is it an intention to Japan or the like. It is a description of the world war that citizens can think of.
World War II date is full Time is already full Only brain decisions and actual military actions will change the world War begins 1939 War ends 1945, 2022 77 years are about to pass. The world is only stimulated by the end of the Genocide Convention, and the European world is becoming more and more troubled. Who can make the decision of the End War? That could be the only answer in the world.
Japan's weaknesses
Nuclear power problem If nuclear power plants located all over the country are landed, it will be a succession of slanderers who cannot fight over a wide area. The priority of the US military alliance is weak.
After that, it is possible for the members of the world as a state sponsor of terrorism, which is theoretically applied, to be a state sponsor of the European Union IS, which is the same name as the gangsters in the region, with the majority of the actual influential people in the region and the personnel state composition above it. The current state of the Japanese national system is
After that, Japan, which is also disliked in Asia, may not be expected by the alliance forces, but it is famous in the news that the chief executive officer of North Korea said that China, South Korea and North Korea would move to Japan on the yellow side.
The attitude that the world's answer is that only the large-scale world war that Europe's most intelligent military personnel should decide now gave birth to the coronavirus, and if the world war was started at that time, the coronavirus might not have occurred. unknown. hair ...
First, let's take into account the current situation of the former British Empire, the victorious country of the world war. Please forgive me if there are no childish details. First of all, as a subtitle, there is no top priority that the world's strongest people should decide other than the start of the world war.
The former British Empire Allied Forces are half-destroyed, while Asia and others continue to grow (it is clear that they are growing as a whole because individuals do not care) See the World Military Power Data Ranking GFP site below
As before the current situation, advanced European countries are dominant in world leadership, but in terms of economy, Microsoft is showing that Asia and India are developing more than 90% of the world's economic and military developmental leadership. The president has been African in recent years, the president of the United States has been President Obama since the beginning of the United States, was African, and is still Google's chief executive, Mr. Pichai (who is strong in India) European world champion. We should have done post-war processing that could make more wins in the times. Simply put, the British Empire should have built a new nation by post-war occupation, as far as anyone can tell, but the colonization was a failure. Currently, both Japan and other parts of Japan have escaped. It is already an independent nation.
Reflection in Europe is to firmly control the upper management with realistic European personnel. It would be impossible in a colony. Once a nation is established, the nation will be established except for the mixed race of victorious nations. It is still possible. I will. In the victory in the world war, for example, Europe does not actually control the cross that other countries say, even if the upper Japanese people dominate the cross, it is their own self-protection or their bed. In reality, it is the people who have the physical body that dominates the upper ranks, and it is they who actually get a large amount of money. It doesn't mean anything, it doesn't make sense because I understand it though there are some.
As far as the database of the GFP government above is concerned, the military power of the world is a big problem that France and the United Kingdom are overtaken by the military power in the yellow region of Asia. However, I think that military power is taken into account in actual wars where the stronger military power does not always win, the number of soldiers, the evaluation of weapons, the evaluation of the defense network, etc., but in reality it is a simple score. Before the mask data of each country, the average ability of soldiers, actual war experience is added to the quality of the army, and average height and average weight are involved in close combat, average weapon maneuvering ability, average shooting score will be important, actual combat experience However, since the United States is totally predominant, the excellent combat experience given to the entire military is a valuable group of assets.
So now the United States has to get more military deployment experience somewhere in the world, where is that country? There is also a strong importance for the end-war against the wide-ranging nation-state, which will win the future world war forever in small-scale battles.
The End War is the lesson of the once unsuccessful United Kingdom and the United States of America, from the establishment of a new nation after the occupation to the birth of a new complete European nation and the migration of immigrants, which stabs one country or a wide range of peoples. can be
Japan, where the current military power is leaping, and Asia, which is frightened by European military power like South Korea, are trying to survive and have a strong military attack on Europe, or Japan, a powerful country that prepares for war protection, is the world champion Britain and France The leader of the European powerhouse, Britain, is a very dangerous thing by itself, as the feat of maintaining the simple military power that overtakes the two countries and further explosively strengthening the military power has been established. I have.
Now, if the world war has a coalition army, for example, a military alliance between Russia and a European powerhouse as Europe is necessary, and it is a common enemy Asia * In the case of war, small businesses are excluded from the target and the world is easy Why don't you go to war when you can win? For example, Japan had an international treaty as a treaty country that could not fight in World War II, but Europe lacks the theory of a victor who must immediately execute the world war on the side that can win the war.
Population with post-war opponents Japan has a population of 120 million, so you don't even have to think about it, it's easy. It will increase.
The United States, Britain, France, Russia, and other European federations that can now engage in world wars will need to mobilize and make decisions beyond NATO and historical ethnic conflicts. This sentence is, for example, a simple and simple math that I thought of when I actually existed in Europe, and of course it is not a declaration of war on Europe.
I think that the European world is required to have the brains of senior Europeans who can start the war. That is the answer because there is no other answer in the world.
The presidents of the European world should not let those who cannot make a decision to start a world war be elected, and a good European leader who is young and has good military leadership experience will be important.
The text is transcribed by Google Translate. The mistake between the first person and the other person. Or, if you make a mistake such as "enemy", or if the radical expression is a translation error at other times, please understand that you are not using a radical document.
You don't have to be obsessed with military art, but there may actually be a tendency to use classic patterns, reference should take into account local tactical trends and cultural claims.
0 Comments
Please feel free to comment